قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Business https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ How to avoid the investor of the PG & E bankruptcy only

How to avoid the investor of the PG & E bankruptcy only



It may be difficult for investors to ignore the irony that PG & E Corp, California utility that announced environmental, social and governance investment scoring cards, could first corporate bankruptcy related to climate change.

But only one investor, Julie Gorte, Senior Vice President of Sustainable Investigation at Pax World Funds, said that only a great drop of PG & E was focusing on the dangers of ticking boxes when it comes on the environment, social and governance or ESG, investment criteria, showed a negligence area regarding the popular investment trend: The investors are not fully considering the risks of climate change adaptation.

PG & E filed for Chapter 1

1 bankruptcy protection due to potential potential liabilities for 2017 and 2018 deadline fires that may be connected to utility equipment, although it is not clear how much the pay utility. California's floating fire – towards the 2017 downturn, has been the most expensive state at $ 11.8 billion – increasingly destructive, and climate change is changing fire fire, scientists and officials said.

"PG and E is a good example for the reason" investors should not make a cutter cookie approach, said Gorte, in an interview.

Investors targeting ESG companies are a range of non-financial criteria, such as a carbon footprint company and the number of female executives. Investors often use ESG ratings together with financial factors in the decision-making process. See many ESG practitioners rather than socially responsible investment, where investors have a more mandated mandate to invest in companies that will be deemed to benefit.

Gorte said that the ESG was fundamental to unlocking better performance by Pax, a newly-established firm in New Hampshire with almost $ 6 billion in managed assets.

But a mixed bag is the evidence evidence that ESG-oriented investors prefer. Pax's longest fund, Pax Balancing Fund

PAXWX, + 0.00%

with approximately $ 1.8 billion in managed assets, 8.1% back in the last ten years, lower than a 9.4% return from a portfolio with a 60% allocation to the S & P 500

SPX, + 0.02%

and 40% of Barclays President's Aggregate Bond index

AGG, -0.12%

.

More than that, research from the BlackRock Investment Institute has shown returns from ESG equity indexes, using 2012 and 2018 as their samples, matching times and sometimes more traditionally beaten indexes. Your US stocks

CSUS, + 0.87%

there was little difference in returns.

Still, the understanding of ESG risks can be useful in individual cases. Pax partly clarified PG & E because of what the fund firm says is the lack of effort to mitigate the risks of fireworks. Other investors were born through a huge investment rating bankruptcy utility only a few weeks before filing a bankruptcy on January 29. For example, PG & E shares appeared to have had some high profile hedge funds as their price decreased. From the beginning of the year, PG & E stock

PCG, + 2.43%

is down 40%, FactSet data shows.

See: PG & E slides in bankruptcy of the third largest investment grade default since 1998

Read: PG stock & Half of its value after filing the plan bankruptcy

With weather models since the 1990s that showed that California was more vulnerable to drought, ESG investors seemed to have been split if it was because of the calls Move further examination of the dangers of rising temperatures and rapidly changing climatic conditions.

But PG & E, mainly, highly regarded by providers of research specialists offering all-in-one ESG scores; For example, renewable sources, offset deficits elsewhere, such as drought vulnerability. In other words, the ESG rating of PG & E would not have a short look at among the largest investors.

As a California facility, PG & E local regulators were obliged to utilize renewable energy sources, and put it among the top in terms of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Sustainalytics rated the company in the 86 percent percentages in the environmental category, and at the 74th centcracy for its overall ESG score.

"Sustainability is a great issue, and there are many different opinions, so it is not surprising that different raters have different views on sustainability," said Gorte.

Read: Buyer Topon Degrees as the most tradable and publicly-traded company

But Gorte said, when it came to adaptation measures to climate change, # 39; companies asked to protect their operations from weather events, PG & E did not significantly lower Pax's assessment.

She stated that the judgment was made when the utility announced that it could cost over $ 75 billion if it tried to fulfill a federal justice proposal to resign prevention, including measures such as cutting trees and cutting branches around power lines. The huge amount of interest was seen as a demonstration of PG & E that has not been done enough to prevent California smokers.

Gorte said that Pax had a dedicated team in the interests of ESG risks, it would only accept ratings from third party data providers that were given but ESG criteria are considered more fully evaluated to attract their own score of PG & E, which showed that the utility "lagard was not a leader." As a result, Pax portfolio managers were banned in investing in stock or PG & E. bonds



Pax World Funds

Julie Gorte

Gorte said climate change adaptation remains in an area where Wall Street has become slow. Hours can be measured according to whether companies can reveal how the increased frequency of extreme weather or higher temperatures can influence the baseline, adjustment may also change that the companies have invested in measures to insulate themselves from those risks.

"Investors were able to [claim climate change] as a long-term risk. Most of the equity analysts look after selling and buying for a period of three or five years, this is not a matter of concern," said Gorte.

He emphasizes joy, he stressed, dangers caused by sweeping drugs through Texas and Florida in 2017 that approximately $ 200 billion was made in damages.

"Look at the insurers and the reinsurers to say about climate change, this is really happening today; it's not a hipiothetical thing," she said.

Read: The government's cost of climate change is $ 350 billion – this is the cost you will

See also Climate change Erasing economic growth, says the big government report

Credit rating companies are also noticing. Fitch gave a rating of 5 on California utilities to exposure to environmental risks in a scale of 1 to 5, indicating that their exposure to rapid climate change was injured by credit ratings. "PG & E courses gave a number of ESG risks ahead. Many of them call PG & E that there is a climate damage," Fitch said in a report published on January 30.

In particular, ESG investment is focused on governance. Really because portfolio managers have a lot of experience with corporate scandals, sustained by lack of board supervision, which results in poor results.

With climate change, investors are still playing up, Gorte said.

Barron: These are the 100 most tradable companies that are traded publicly

Providing critical information for the US trading day. Subscribe to the MarketWatch free newsletter that you need to know. Sign up here.


Source link