Due to a large number of class outbreaks emerging across the United States, there are challenges facing Facebook in tackling widespread non-formation of vaccines on their platform, which emerged
World Health Organization named "hesitancy vaccine" recently as one of the largest global health threats in 2019. But on Facebook , in public pages and in private groups with thousands of members, false information about vaccines – mainly arising from a study that is currently carried out since 1998 is that immunization is linked to reducing autism – rampant and tough to pin. In bubble groups closed, users warn against the dangers of vaccinations, citing pseudoscience and conspiracy theories.
Facebook confirmed that combat information is one of its key priorities. But when it comes to pollution of misleading content about vaccinations, the site has a serious challenge. Most anti-vaccination materials do not override Facebook community guidelines to stimulate "global harm", according to spokesperson, and site algorithms often promote independent pages or jobs on the issue. The parents are still crazy, and as the spread of fake news facts has shown, many users have difficulty in distinguishing between reliable sources and unreliable ones.
Facebook "anti-vaxx" groups have overlapped the revival of the toys, a disease that was "end" in the United States in 2000 because of the vaccine, the sticks and the rubella vaccine. However, cases have increased in recent years, with at least 10 states appearing in this winter. Last month, Washington Gov declared. Jay Inslee (D) has a state of emergency after taking 35 cases of adhesive in one county, where almost a quarter of the children attend school without immune immunization, distress and ruby. Name the WHO that the disease is very fast as the primary cause of death for children.
Although immunization information could be fatal consequences, a Facebook spokesman said the company did not believe that this material would not raise awareness.
"While we work hard to achieve material that violates our policies, we give our community tools to control what they see as well as using Facebook to speak and comment share with the community around them, "Facebook said in an email statement to The Post. "If the content they put forward through the line and our policies are over, we want to get the matter out as soon as we can know."
The company is considering options to make accurate information about vaccinations that are more user friendly, but these efforts are in the initial stages. Meanwhile, Facebook sees that users have a factual anti-speech to protect their potential, he said.
Wendy Sue Swanson, a pediatrician at the Seattle Children's Hospital and American Pediatric Academy spokeswoman, recently launched Facebook's strategies for dealing with public health issues, including non-vaccinated information on vaccines, on the scene. Swanson said that there is no Facebook post to talk about immunization, but to ensure that users have comprehensive access to content that is scientifically valid.
"You would not look at a pediatric who does not have a medical certificate, but on the Internet, you could hear them," said Swanson. "Facebook is not responsible for changing search but they have an opportunity to change the way in which information is served."
But Facebook algorithms often promote advanced anti-vaccine content for posts or pages that are scientifically taken on pages. An investigation by the Guardian recently found that the vaccine Facebook search results for "vaccines were due to the anti-vaccination protocol." Facebook did not answer questions from the Head of Director regarding their plans to deal with the issue.
"Using a new account with no friends or good, use the Guardian Facebook search bar to start the word" vaccine "," said the investigation. "An early warning angle began on search terms that would cause a user to anti-vaccine nonformation, such as" vaccination reeducation discussion forum "," vaccine recycling "," vaccination truth movement "and" movement of vaccination resistance ".
Vax Truther, Anti-Vaxxer Vaccines, Revealed Vaccines and Michigan for Vaccine Choice, among others were accepted by Facebook , according to another Garda investigation.
A recent study of the Accreditation and Health Feedback Summary, a group of scientists who consider a cluster of accuracy Dach is the health media, most healthcare is clicked The risks of Facebook in 2018 were false, or they had a significant amount of misleading information. The study of the top 100 health stories best viewed the biggest social media commitments, and a network of experts evaluated their credibility. The study found that less than half was "very credible". The vaccines were among the three most popular storytelling.
"Given that almost half the total shares represent the number of shares for neutral goods and poor rating, this indicates that more work needs to be done to contribute to the spread of inaccurate health news," written by experts in study. "Much of the spread is facilitated by Facebook, which represents 96 percent of the shares of the top 100 content."
Facebook video check partners can review health related content, which means that it is misleading or false in user foods and appear as well as related articles from checks checks. But this does not work in groups, where most of the anti-vaccination content is scattered.
A work paper exploded by the National Economic Research Bureau in November on the role of Facebook in relation to the spread of false information about vaccines. The paper found that anti-vaccination content shares were reduced as a result of the prohibition of Facebook advertisements linked to fake news stories. But in anti-vaccination circles, the notices are private – there are people. He found that anti-vaccine groups on Facebook tend to tackle the same misleading links and the junk sector, and then disseminate the information to the wider community through amenities, shares and oral words.
"Most vaccination information Individuals have spread – and most of those misrepresentation by some individuals – share the message organically," said Catherine Tucker, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and NBER paper co-author by email to The Post. "It's a much harder problem to solve that, because tension is trying to clamp out that kind of social sharing while trying to spend free preservation."